无码天堂

By Rachel Lawler

The early years sector faces losing a quarter of a billion pounds over the spring term due to the withdrawal of vital government funding, according to new analysis from independent researcher Ceeda.

Analysis of a recent survey carried out by the 无码天堂 and Ceeda shows that almost two thirds of nurseries and pre-schools (65%) and four in 10 (42%) childminders reported having fewer children taking up funded childcare places this January, compared to the same period in 2020.

The government鈥檚 recent decision to base funding for funded early years places for two-, three- and four-year-olds on the number of children currently registered at early years settings during the spring term, rather than on pre-pandemic attendance levels as it in 2020, means that in the spring term:

• group-based providers with lower headcounts will lose an estimated average of 拢13,390 funding
• childminders with lower headcounts will lose an estimated average of 拢2,485 funding

This means that the sector is currently facing total losses of 拢247 million over this period.

Vital funding support
During the summer and autumn of 2020, the government continued to fund early entitlement places for two-, three- and four-old based on pre-pandemic attendance levels. However, this support was removed in January 2021, with funding now paid based on the actual number of children on roll. 

The Department for Education鈥檚 own latest statistics on early years attendance levels show that the number of children attending nurseries, pre-schools and childminders during the latest national lockdown is just 62% of normal daily levels (compared to November 2020 when it was 85%).

Furlough support
The government has claimed that early years providers can recover their funding losses through furlough support.

However, as wage costs account for around three-quarters of providers' overall costs, and the Job Retention Scheme only provides funding for 80% of wage costs, even if a setting was able to claim maximum furlough support, this would still only equate to around 59% of what they had lost for an unoccupied funded place.

The joint 无码天堂/Ceeda survey also found that only a minority of providers (45% of nurseries and pre-schools and 19% of childminders employing assistants) had any members of staff on furlough at the time of the survey, with many only able to receive limited support from the Job Retention team, for a number of reasons:

• 40% of nurseries and pre-schools said occupancy was fluctuating rapidly, making it hard to plan ahead for required staffing levels.
• Almost a third (31%) said they still needed their staff despite falling demand, to manage increased cleaning (77%), cover high Covid-related staff absence (66%) and manage the higher staff-child ratios required by 鈥榖ubbles鈥�.
• A quarter (24%) said the additional criteria for furlough claims in early years provision meant it was not possible to claim support for a post only partly paid by funded income.

Support for childminders
In addition, the majority of childminders (85%) do not employ staff and are therefore not eligible for furlough support.

While most childminders are eligible for the Self-employed Income Support Scheme (SEISS), the decision to calculate this support based on profits rather than income has meant that for childminders, many of whom have made little profit over recent years, the financial support offered by the scheme is limited.

Newly-employed childminders, who fall outside of the eligibility criteria, have received no support at all from SEISS.

Frontline workers
Neil Leitch, chief executive of the 无码天堂, said: "Nurseries, pre-schools and childminders have been on the frontline throughout this pandemic. It beggars belief, therefore, that at a time when early years providers need the most help to ensure that they can remain sustainable, the government has inexplicably chosen to reduce the level of financial support it is willing to offer.

鈥淲ith the sector facing spring term funding losses of nearly a quarter of a billion pounds, it is absolutely critical that the government reverts back to basing early years funding on pre-pandemic attendance levels, as it did during the summer and autumn term last year.

鈥淲e urge the Treasury to use this week鈥檚 Budget to commit to providing the support that our vital sector needs during this incredibly difficult period, so that settings can continue to deliver quality education and care, both now and in the long term.鈥�

Short-sighted under investment
Dr Jo Verrill, managing director at CEEDA, commented: 鈥淭he pandemic has thrown into sharp relief how vital the country鈥檚 early education and childcare infrastructure is for children, parents and employers. It seems this point has yet to be fully understood by the Treasury. The retraction of funding support at this crucial time is the latest example in a long, well-evidenced, history of short-sighted under-investment in children鈥檚 futures, and parent鈥檚 capacity to work.鈥�